KenR wrote:Gloucester City did indeed have huge water tanks installed ,when they had their new ground built, for future use, but these could n't cope when the Severn burst its banks; with no insurance they were forced to ground share when the ground was submerged and have n't moved back to the City yet.AVFCYELTZ wrote:Can't we drain the water and save it for drought season when the pitch has been reseeded?
I thought there was already a smaller tank at the Grove? although I think there were "payment issues" with a previous regime that mean the pump had been removed by the supplier. Perhaps I am out of date on that matter?
I previously calculated that 1" of rain water was 127m3 (assuming a 50mx100m pitch for simplicity). a tank similar to that at Loughborough (estimated radius of 5m and height of 3m) would contain 245m3, so therefore would capture/contain just under 2" of rain water.
This would still require:
* a capture system (Raiden's "plastic sheet")
* piping to the storage tank
* siting the storage tank (space is at a premium at the Grove)
* pumps to remove the water from the storage tank to water the pitch
* drainage of the excess rainwater (when too much for the storage tank to hold) with attendant payment to water authorities
All in all, this seems to be a serious amount of engineering and looks like it has big £ signs attached
I also believe that Mike Burke has recently renegotiated water arrangements and brought about significant saving to the clubs outgoings in this area, so significant changes might be untimely
having said that, the easy availability of water bombs sounds interesting
